Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something "Alive" and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It - A professor, biologist, and physiologist argues that modern Darwinisms materialist and mechanistic biases have led to a scientific dead end, unable to define what life isand only an openness to the qualities of "purpose and desire" will move the field forward. Scott Turner contends. "To be scientists, we force ourselves into a Hobsons choice on the matter: accept intentionality and purposefulness as real attributes of life, which disqualifies you as a scientist; or become a scientist and dismiss lifes distinctive quality from your thinking. I have come to believe that this choice actually stands in the way of our having a fully coherent theory of life." Growing research shows thatlife's most distinctive quality, shared by all living things, ispurpose and desire: maintain homeostasis to sustain life. In Purpose and Desire, Turner draws on the work of Claude Bernard, a contemporary of Darwin revered among physiologists as the founder of experimental medicine, to build on Bernards "dangerous idea" of vitalism, which seeks to identify what makes "life" a unique phenomenon of nature. To further its quest to achieve a fuller understanding of life, Turner argues, science must move beyond strictly accepted measures that consider only the mechanics of nature. A thoughtful appeal to widen our perspective of biology that is grounded in scientific evidence, Purpose and Desire helps us bridge the ideological evolutionary divide.


Download Now Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something "Alive" and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It


Book Details

️Book Title : Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something "Alive" and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It
⚡Book Author : J. Scott Turner
⚡Page : 352 pages
⚡Published September 12th 2017 by HarperOne (first published 2017)


Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something "Alive" and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It

A professor, biologist, and physiologist argues that modern Darwinisms materialist and mechanistic biases have led to a scientific dead end, unable to define what life isand only an openness to the qualities of "purpose and desire" will move the field forward. Scott Turner contends. "To be scientists, we force ourselves into a Hobsons choice on the matter: accept intentionality and purposefulness as real attributes of life, which disqualifies you as a scientist; or become a scientist and dismiss lifes distinctive quality from your thinking. I have come to believe that this choice actually stands in the way of our having a fully coherent theory of life." Growing research shows thatlife's most distinctive quality, shared by all living things, ispurpose and desire: maintain homeostasis to sustain life. In Purpose and Desire, Turner draws on the work of Claude Bernard, a contemporary of Darwin revered among physiologists as the founder of experimental medicine, to build on Bernards "dangerous idea" of vitalism, which seeks to identify what makes "life" a unique phenomenon of nature. To further its quest to achieve a fuller understanding of life, Turner argues, science must move beyond strictly accepted measures that consider only the mechanics of nature. A thoughtful appeal to widen our perspective of biology that is grounded in scientific evidence, Purpose and Desire helps us bridge the ideological evolutionary divide.